September 24, 2014
Last Thursday, the IRS released guidance regarding current Section 125 rules that is likely to be well-received by most employers. The guidance permits two new permitted election changes (prospective revocations) to correspond with some unintended consequences created under the employer shared responsibility rules under Section 4980H and new coverage options available through the public Marketplace (Exchange). For those employers who choose to adopt such changes, the new rules provide more flexibility for individuals in either of two scenarios: (i) those changing from employer-sponsored group health coverage to other minimum essential coverage (MEC) options due to a reduction in hours; or (ii) those changing from employer-sponsored group health coverage to a qualified health plan (QHP) during a special enrollment period or annual open enrollment period through a public Marketplace (Exchange).
Effective Date
The guidance is effective immediately. Section 125 rules will be updated accordingly, but pending further guidance, employers may amend Section 125 (Cafeteria) plans to adopt the newly permitted election changes in accordance with the guidance currently provided.
Background
In general, Section 125 (Cafeteria) plan rules do not allow mid-year changes in elections through the end of a plan year. If premiums for employer-sponsored group health plan coverage are taken on a pre-tax basis, Section 125 rules allow mid-year election changes only for certain specified events, such as:
Keep in mind that even if the Section 125 rules allow for a mid-year election change, the employers ultimately may decide whether to allow such changes. It is necessary for the plan document to address which, if any, of the events allowed under the Section 125 rules will be recognized for purposes of participant mid-year election changes.
Section 125 Issues Addressed by This Guidance
The guidance addresses two issues that have arisen relative to the interaction between current Section 125 rules and coverage requirements/availability under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
Section 125 rule updates
Participants permitted to revoke Section 125 elections due to a reduction in hours
Participants are allowed to prospectively revoke elections for an employer-sponsored group health plan providing minimum essential coverage (MEC) if:
Participants permitted to revoke Section 125 elections due to QHP coverage availability
Participants are allowed to prospectively revoke elections for an employer-sponsored group health plan providing minimum essential coverage (MEC) if:
NOTE – under either of the revocations allowed above, the employer may rely on a reasonable representation that the participants intend to enroll in a QHP or another MEC plan in accordance with the allowable time frames.
Plan Amendments
To allow the newly permitted election changes under this notice, the Section 125 (Cafeteria) plan must be amended to adopt such changes on or before the last day of the plan year in which the elections are allowed. The adopted changes may be effective retroactively to the first day of the plan year, provided that the employer informs participants of the amendment and allows participant mid-year election changes only on a prospective basis. Please contact your Benefits Team at PS&F if you have any questions about the amendment or drafting employee communications.
Summary
This welcome guidance allows employers wishing to provide individuals with additional flexibility in regard to Section 125 mid-year election changes due to a reduction in hours or eligibility for a QHP through a public Marketplace (Exchange) to do so, effective immediately, by adopting such changes in their Section 125 plans and notifying participants accordingly.
As always, should you have any questions, please contact your Parker, Smith & Feek Benefits Team.
We strive for the most accurate and up-to-date information. Neither the publisher nor the author can accept liability for any inaccuracies or changed circumstances of any information herein or for the consequences of any reliance placed upon it. This publication is distributed on the Understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice or services. Readers should always seek professional advice before entering into any commitments.
The views and opinions expressed within are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Parker, Smith & Feek. While every effort has been taken in compiling this information to ensure that its contents are totally accurate, neither the publisher nor the author can accept liability for any inaccuracies or changed circumstances of any information herein or for the consequences of any reliance placed upon it.