December 7, 2017
In a vote taken early Saturday morning, the Senate passed its version of tax legislation. This increases the chances of the final bill being signed by the president and becoming law before the new year. However, it’s not over yet.
Both the House and the Senate have passed different tax bills. These differences must be resolved in a Conference Committee, which will begin its work this week. Once the Conference Committee completes its work, each chamber must again separately approve the legislation. If approved, the final legislation goes to the president for his signature, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said this will happen before Christmas.
The timing could get complicated in light of the special election in Alabama for Jeff Session’s former senate seat. Experts seem to think that the winner in that election will be sworn in by December 22 at the latest, and that increases the uncertainty in the Senate around votes for a final bill.
Some of the provisions included in the current versions of the legislation will have a direct effect on employee benefits. These include:
Under the Senate version of the bill, the so-called individual mandate is effectively repealed. (Technically it stays on the books, but the penalty goes to zero.) Senator Collins (R-Maine) ultimately supported this provision in exchange for a commitment to vote on bipartisan legislation intended to provide support to the individual market.
Importantly, the employer mandate and employer reporting (and all the associated penalties) remain on the books. It’s critical that employers understand that the pay or play penalties remain in effect and that employer reporting is still required.
The Cadillac tax on high-cost plans is not eliminated in the legislation. Some believe that tax could be eliminated in 2018.
Although there is a lot to monitor in the coming days and weeks, nothing has changed yet. We recommend that no action be taken until the final legislation is enacted and signed.
The views and opinions expressed within are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Parker, Smith & Feek. While every effort has been taken in compiling this information to ensure that its contents are totally accurate, neither the publisher nor the author can accept liability for any inaccuracies or changed circumstances of any information herein or for the consequences of any reliance placed upon it.